Services

Research first. Then the writing.

Every engagement starts the same way, with a question worth answering and a search of what is already known about it. What changes is the shape of the deliverable and who has to be convinced by it.

01

Researched articles and features

Explanatory and reported pieces for publications and for company editorial programmes. I pitch the angle, find and read the primary sources, interview where the story needs a voice, and deliver a piece that an editor can run with light handling.

  • Search and source appraisal before drafting
  • Expert interviews arranged and conducted
  • Full source list with links, supplied with the draft
  • One substantive revision round included

Good fit when you need a piece on a technical subject that a generalist writer would get subtly wrong.

02

Evidence briefs and research summaries

A structured read of the literature on one question. What the body of evidence supports, how strong it is, where it disagrees with itself, and what that means for the decision in front of you. Delivered as a document your team can circulate internally or publish.

  • Defined question and transparent search approach
  • Study-by-study appraisal, not a link roundup
  • Clear statement of confidence and of limits
  • Plain-language summary for non-specialist stakeholders

Good fit when a claim, a product position or a strategy depends on what the science actually says.

03

White papers and long-form reports

The flagship asset. A substantial, properly sourced document that establishes a company as the serious voice in its category, built from the literature rather than from competitor blog posts.

  • Scoping session and outline approved before drafting
  • Original synthesis of published evidence
  • Charts and tables specified from the underlying data
  • Designed handover notes for your design team

Good fit when you need one asset that does the work of twenty blog posts.

04

Thought leadership and bylined commentary

Writing published under a founder's or technical lead's name that sounds like them and survives scrutiny from their peers. I interview you, find the argument, check it against the evidence, and write it.

  • Voice capture from interview and existing writing
  • Argument tested against the published record
  • Drafted for the target publication's house style
  • Pitch support where the piece is placed externally

Good fit when the person with the credibility does not have the hours to write.

05

Case studies and customer stories

Evidence-shaped customer stories. What the problem actually was, what changed, and what the numbers show, written so a sceptical buyer finishes it more convinced rather than less.

  • Customer interview conducted and transcribed
  • Results stated with their real context and caveats
  • Approval-ready draft for the customer's comms team
  • Short-form variants for sales and social use

Good fit when your results are strong and the current write-up is not doing them justice.

06

Editorial and technical review

A second pair of eyes on content your team has already drafted. I check the claims against the sources, flag what will not survive review, and mark what needs a specialist sign-off.

  • Claim-by-claim source verification
  • Flagging of regulatory and clinical risk language
  • Structural and clarity edit
  • Written note on what to fix and why

Good fit when you have volume already and need confidence that it is accurate.

07

How a project runs

Step 01

Scope

A short call or a written brief. We agree the question, the reader, the length, the deadline and a fixed fee before any work starts.

Step 02

Research

Search, read, appraise, interview. You receive an outline with the key sources attached before I write a word of prose.

Step 03

Draft

A full draft with every factual claim traceable to a source. Anything I could not verify is flagged rather than smoothed over.

Step 04

Revise

One substantive revision round is included. Further rounds are quoted, and structural changes to an approved outline are treated as new scope.

On fees

I quote a fixed price per project rather than a rate per word, because the research is where the time goes and word count is a poor proxy for it. Tell me the question, the audience and the deadline and you will have a number and a delivery date back within two working days. Small pieces and large reports are both welcome. Bulk low-cost content is not what this is for.

Work with me

Bring me a question that deserves a real answer.

cypriankimomo@gmail.com
Start a brief LinkedIn ORCID